In this webinar, we will hear from an author of the disability community amicus brief in Endrew and one of the thought leaders in this arena about the implications of Endrew for students with disabilities and their advocates.
Date training recorded: Dec 5, 2017
Trainer(s): Arlene Mayerson
Sponsoring Organization(s): Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF)


DETAILS

It had been over 35 years since the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) decision in Board of Education v. Rowley interpreting the meaning of the lynchpin of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA)- the right to a free appropriate education (FAPE). In those 35 years, lower federal courts developed watered down and ineffective formulas for determining if students with disabilities were receiving FAPE. Many courts held that students with disabilities were receiving FAPE if they received more than a de minimus educational benefit. This year, SCOTUS revisited the meaning of FAPE, rejecting these low standards i. In this webinar, we will hear from an author of the disability community amicus brief in Endrew and one of the thought leaders in this arena about the implications of Endrew for students with disabilities and their advocates.

1 hour of Elimination of Bias CLE.

Some materials can be accessed here.

Please also read the two resources referenced in the webinar:

Presenter:
Arlene Mayerson, Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund 

To use this training for self-study MCLE credit, please complete the evaluation form on our website and submit it to trainings@laaconline.org in order to receive certification for your self-study records.

If you would like to support LAAC’s videos and keep this service free for the community, please donate!

This webinar is intended to provide legal information, not legal advice for the purposes of training only practicing attorneys. The legal information in this webinar is not intended to be a substitute for seeking personalized legal advice from an attorney licensed to practice in your jurisdiction. Further, we do not intend to create an attorney-client relationship with any listener.

New Horizons for Students with Disabilities: Implications from the SCOTUS decision in Endrew v. Douglas Co. Sch District


ADDITIONAL INFO

Training URL
Additional Materials URL
Series: Disability, Members-Only, Specialty MCLE Credits
MCLE: 1 hour (Elimination of Bias)
Last revised: Oct 23, 2018 11:16 am